By Tatsien Li, Yongji Tan, Zhijie Cai, Wei Chen, Jingnong Wang
Spontaneous capability (SP) well-logging is without doubt one of the commonest and helpful well-logging innovations in petroleum exploitation. This monograph is the 1st of its type at the mathematical version of spontaneous power well-logging and its numerical ideas. The mathematical version confirmed during this publication exhibits the need of introducing Sobolev areas with fractional energy, which heavily raises the trouble of proving the well-posedness and offering numerical resolution schemes. during this booklet, within the axisymmetric state of affairs the well-posedness of the corresponding mathematical version is proved and 3 effective schemes of numerical resolution are proposed, supported by means of a few numerical examples to fulfill useful computation needs.
Read Online or Download Mathematical Model of Spontaneous Potential Well-Logging and Its Numerical Solutions PDF
Similar number systems books
The time period differential-algebraic equation used to be coined to contain differential equations with constraints (differential equations on manifolds) and singular implicit differential equations. Such difficulties come up in quite a few purposes, e. g. limited mechanical structures, fluid dynamics, chemical response kinetics, simulation of electric networks, and keep watch over engineering.
This monograph examines and develops the worldwide Smoothness upkeep estate (GSPP) and the form renovation estate (SPP) within the box of interpolation of capabilities. The research is built for the univariate and bivariate situations utilizing famous classical interpolation operators of Lagrange, Grünwald, Hermite-Fejér and Shepard kind.
Coupled with its sequel, this publication offers a hooked up, unified exposition of Approximation idea for services of 1 genuine variable. It describes areas of features reminiscent of Sobolev, Lipschitz, Besov rearrangement-invariant functionality areas and interpolation of operators. different themes comprise Weierstrauss and most sensible approximation theorems, houses of polynomials and splines.
Unique numerical thoughts are already had to take care of nxn matrices for giant n. Tensor info are of dimension nxnx. .. xn=n^d, the place n^d exceeds the pc reminiscence through some distance. they seem for difficulties of excessive spatial dimensions. for the reason that regular equipment fail, a selected tensor calculus is required to regard such difficulties.
- Karst in China: Its Geomorphology and Environment (Springer Series in Physical Environment)
- Biorthogonality and its Applications to Numerical Analysis (Chapman & Hall/CRC Pure and Applied Mathematics)
- Strong Asymptotics for Extremal Polynomials Associated with Weights on R (Lecture Notes in Mathematics)
- Numerical Methods in Multidimensional Radiative Transfer
Additional info for Mathematical Model of Spontaneous Potential Well-Logging and Its Numerical Solutions
2. 1, there exists wε ∈ Wε such that as ε → 0, wε → w strongly in H∗1 (Ω). Denote vε = uε − wε |Ωε . 28), for any given φε ∈ Wε0 (Ωε ) we have aε (vε , φε ) = lε (φε ) − aε (wε , φε ). 33) Evidently, vε ∈ Wε0 (Ωε ). Taking φε = vε in the above formula yields aε (vε , vε ) = lε (vε ) − aε (wε , vε ). 34) Then we obtain ∇vε 2 L2∗ (Ωε ) ≤ C vε H∗1 (Ωε ) + ∇wε L2∗ (Ωε ) ∇vε L2∗ (Ωε ) . 35) Since as ε → 0, wε converges to w strongly in H∗1 (Ω), ∇wε L2∗ (Ωε ) is uniformly bounded with respect to ε. 2.
Since there are spontaneous potential differences on the interfaces γk (k = 1, . . , 5), we have to make a corresponding treatment. 12). For any given element e, if the node point q ∈ γk+ , we take it as a common node point to which no extra treatment is needed since u+ q (denoted by uq ) is kept as a − freedom. 12), we have u− q = uq − Ek (q), the contribution of which to the variational form is then σe ∇Np · ∇Nq uq − Ek (q) rdrdz e = σe ∇Np · ∇Nq rdrdz uq − e σe ∇Np · ∇Nq rdrdz Ek (q). 8) where Ae·q stands for the q-column of the element stiffness matrix Ae , and Ek (q) stands for the value of the spontaneous potential difference Ek at point q.
We fix the physical parameters and geometric parameters as in the case of Fig. 4 except E1 . Take E1 = 20 mV and E1 = 250 mV for the numerical simulation, respectively, and plot the vectors of electric field and the level curves of potential for these two cases, as shown in Figs. 6 and Figs. 8, respectively. From these figures we find two important facts. Firstly, the electric field varies seriously around point A but evenly around point B, since the compatible condition is satisfied at point B but violated at point A in both cases.